The Tourist movie

Formats Detail

DivX

Video Codec mpeg4
Resolution 720x304
Video Bitrate 2056kb
Audio Codec mp3
Audio Channels 2
Audio Bitrate 128kb
FPS 25000
File Size 1411 Mb
Preview File Size 54 Mb
Language en
Download in DivX format

Actors

Paul Bettany, Rufus Sewell, Johnny Depp, Angelina Jolie, Ralf Moeller, Igor Jijikine, Steven Robertson, Timothy Dalton, Steven Berkoff, Mark Zak, Iddo Goldberg, Raoul Bova, Vladimir Tevlovski, Bruno Bilotta, Clément Sibony, Vladimir Orlov, Renato Scarpa, Daniele Pecci, Christian De Sica, Alessio Boni, Giovanni Guidelli, Bruno Wolkowitch, Marc Ruchmann, Julien Baumgartner, François Vincentelli, Jean-Claude Adelin, Jean-Marie Lamour, Nicolas Guillot, Mhamed Arezki, Alec Utgoff, Neri Marcorè, Gabriele Gallinari, Riccardo De Torrebruna, Maurizio Casagrande, Nino Frassica, Gwilym Lee, Giancarlo Previati, Giovanni Esposito, Marino Narduzzi, Tino Giada,

Director

Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck

126 Comments


  1. runt2 from Kansas, United States
    Dec 08, 2010

    WASTE of Wonderful INGREDIENTS

    !!The director of photography was excellent, many Beautiful Pictures!!
    This film was upsetting. There was no reason for this film not to have
    done very well. The audience is intelligent enough to see the rich
    elements bought to the table were, simply left to spoil. The primary
    focus somehow seemed to be a preoccupation with Smoking! What a
    Ridiculous WASTE. I Feel SORRY for the Wonderful Talents in this film.
    It's just a Shame. I gave it 3 stars because of the rich talent and
    beautiful pictures. One scene was a little too over coordinated. (It's
    rare in Life to have outfits so conveniently coordinated with the
    furniture coverings.) However, I feel it was a saving grace by keeping
    our attention to something during this ordeal of distress. I liked the
    femininity of wardrobe they used to paint Angelina. She did an
    incredible job of maintaining balance hopping in and out, off and on
    those tiny boats. I shun to think the degree of damage done to the
    wardrobe being strewn over all the splintered boards. Also, how
    incredible to never have a drop of water to any apparel. This was not a
    Wardrobe issue, so I do not fault them. I believe someone will be
    struggling for projects long after this hits the floor. I am Upset for
    the Talent. Quite distressed for them. 0=/


  2. dangreenberg2 from United States
    Dec 08, 2010

    no artistic vision

    The premiere was a disaster, no surprise they didn't organize any press
    junkets and screenings in the US. The studio tried to control the
    damage, but after seeing the film I don't think they can prevent it
    from being the biggest box office disappointment of the year.

    A previous reviewer mentioned it was so boring he fell asleep; I wish I
    could have slept through the pain of being embarrassed for the two A
    class actors struggling with poor dialogue , no vision and no
    direction. I hate to say it, but even the mediocre French version, aka
    Anthony Zimmer, is by far more interesting with a budget that was
    probably a fraction of the Hollywood extravaganza.


  3. avid78 from New York, New York
    Dec 07, 2010

    Pretty Bad

    Went to the Premiere last night in nyc at the Ziegfield Theater and it
    was pretty bad. I kept falling asleep during the 1st half (I never fall
    asleep during a movie, I'm a total move dork) so the 1st half was very
    slow. I kept saying to my wife that it feels like 3 different movies
    crammed into one and then I just read on IMDb that it went through 3
    directors and the final director Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck left
    then came back. So the whole movie feels exactly like 3 different
    versions. It doesn't know if it wants to be a spy thriller, a comedic
    bond movie or a light romantic comedy? The dialouge was pretty bad and
    actors I think did the best they could with what they had but I'm sure
    originally there was a decent movie there but it looks like studio
    hands and creative differences totally fubared the whole thing. The
    only good part was the after party, two words……..risotto station!!


  4. ArtHouseRoyalty from United States
    Dec 06, 2010

    Awful, Awful, Awful

    I just returned from the premiere a couple of moments ago (it was on
    54th street, I live on 57th). This must be one of the worst films I've
    ever seen.

    To think that this film was directed and written by the same
    writer/director of "The Lives of Others" just makes me sick to my
    stomach.

    It is one thing to see a terrible 3rd grade Hollywood flick in cinema
    with friends or family and another thing to watch it together with the
    stars, director and production company, all cheering and clapping to
    what is obviously a terrible movie.

    Everything about this movie is awful – the writing, the direction…
    even the cinematography – with some scenes lit as if it was a first
    year student film at NYU.

    But it really all boils down to the terrible writing and story – B
    movie jokes and gags, 3rd rate dialogue, a ridiculous last moment
    "twist", and a story that's far worse than the worst Bond movie.

    How bad is it? It "reads" like a Leslie Nielsen thriller parody.
    Wait… and even as a parody it wouldn't work.

    If I knew better I would think the script was written as an exercise by
    a 1st year student in some community college in Oklahoma.

    I'm devastated. This has ruined "The Lives of Others" for me, which up
    until two hours ago was one of my favorite movies. Everybody involved
    with this movie shouldn't be making films.

    It will be an awful flop at the box office and the critics will
    decimate it…

    Awful.

Leave a Reply

Security Code:

Genre

Year

Format

Country

Recent Searches

Top 30 Queries